Skip to main content

Three bad omens for three greatest warriors

After the English King Edward the confessor died, Harold was crowned king. No sooner did Harold fought Harald Hardrada in Stamford Bridge and killed the Viking leader, he rushed to the south to the battle in Hastings with William the Duke of Normandy.

There were three bad omens for these three great warriors. Their attitude toward the bad omen is quite interesting, we can see how a man can change a disadvantage to advantage, and nuisance to encouragement.

At the end of April, a couple of nights after Easter, there was a terrifying sign that disaster might be about to strike die English. A weird "long-haired star" appeared in the night sky; a star that seemed to have a tail of glowing white fire. We know it now as Halley's Cormet and it was making its usual 76-year appearance, but to the superstitious people of 1066 it was a supernatural omen; its fiery "tail was a warning of the actual fires that would follow below it, in its wake. Harold stood with members of the witangemot outside Edward's palace at Westminster, what did he make of this sign? Even if Harofd was not the superstitious man, without modern science, he couldn't do any thing to be an bad omen-breaker, except that he can find another explanation which may be in his advantage.

The Vikings wreaked havoc along the north-eastern coastline of Englan and they put ashore at Cleveland. It was said that Harald jumped ashore he stumbled and fell - a very bad omen. But Harald might be just a great warrior rather than a smart politician. This same stumble-and-fall happened to William Bastard the Duke of Nomandy.

Legend has it that William stumbled as he set foot ashore. William would have been perfectly aware that this was considered a bad omen, so he lifted up handfuls of shingle and shouted that he was seizing his new kingdom in both hands. And what is more, it looked as though he was going to do so without any resistance.

From a man's response to a bad omen, we seems already know a man's fate.

[caption id="attachment_214" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="The Death of Harold"]The Death of Harold[/caption]

William might be  superstitious himself, but he has the capability of changing almost any bad omen into a good one, and grab any chance to encourage his soldier, and laughed off  frustrations.

It is said that in an uncharacteristic show of nerves, he managed to put his hauberk on back to front. Knowing how superstitious his soldiers were, he laughed off this potential bad omen by saying, "Thus shall my dukedom be turned into kingdom."
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nightsoil men

In Victorian time, building were often put up before water and sewage pipes were laid down so a single tap or pump might have to serve hundreds of people. Toilet waste was carried away by 'nightsoil men'.  Some seeped into the water supply and rivers became polluted by factory and human waste. In 1858, the Thames in London became so smelly that the year was known as 'the year of the Great Stink'!
Post a Comment
Read more

The Indian Mutiny

British rulers were shaken to the core by the Indian Mutiny of 1857. The spark which lit the fuse of the rebellion was when cartridges were given to Indian troops which were coated in grease, made from cow or pig fat. These cartridges had to be prepared for firing by being bitten at one end. The cow is a sacred animal to the Hindus and the pig is regarded as unclean by Muslims, so no one was happy. Indian troops refused to bite the cartridges. Their British officers hanged a few. The troops rioted. They killed their officers, ransacked Delhi, and massacred British men, women and children. For a long time it looked as if the British might be defeated. The rebellion was about more than just biting cartridges. It was a revolt against taxation and the laws of the East India Company, which ruled India for Britain. After the mutiny, the British were a lot more careful about how they governed India. When the news of the mutiny reached England, crowds bayed for blood and Victoria was hor...
Post a Comment
Read more

Panic or panick

There is only one spelling for panic ; the verb is inflected 'panic, panics, panicked, and panicking’. The form panick is used for progressive tense, past tense and past participle. We don't write panick today, though English speakers from a few hundred years ago might have (in the same way they might have written musick). When the alternate spelling “panick” is used for the past participle: "I panicked last night at the disco." When it’s use for progressive tense: “Invariably, when markets are panicking, they sell the stocks quickly.” It's the rule for root words ending in "c" is that you have to add “k”, so the spelling is related with the pronunciation. If we don't add the <k>, it looks as if the <c> has to be pronounced /s/. If the "k" was not there, “panicing” would look like the word which is supposed to be pronounced as if it is ended in "sing," while “paniced” would be pronounced like “panised”. The same ...
1 comment
Read more