Skip to main content

Dragon rider

This is a book of  a warm-hearted dream, written by Cornelia Funke. Cornelia Funke was born in 1958, in Hamburg, northern Germany, and grew up in Dorsten, a little town in the middle of Germany. She is a writer and Illustrator, when she couldn't get good stires to illustrate, she started to write them herself.

Firedrake, a brave young dragon, his loyal brownie friend sorrel and a lonely boy called Ben are on a magical journey to find the legendary place where silver dragons can live in peace for ever. With the help of a map and the whispered memories of an old dragon, they fly across moonlit lands and sea to reach the highest mountains in the world. Along the way, they made new friends ahead and fought old heartless monster behind, who was from the past and has been waiting for a very long time to destroy the last dragons on earth.

From the map we learned that Firedrake's journey started from The Valley of the Dragon in Scotland, they crossed the Mediterranean sea, and Middle East, then to Himalayas, the highest mountain in the world, where the Rim of Heaven lies.

In a letter to her fan,  Cornelia tells how the Dragon Rider was written, and said, "Only by writing such a big book did I learn that your characters can develop a life of their own - and that a truly adventurous writer lets them show you the way."  This is quite right indeed. This makes me thinking if  blogs have the similar characteristics, when you keep updating your blog, then will the blog pull the author around?

This book was supposed to be used for a TV cartoon show, the TV producer asked Cornelia to stretch a dragon story, but Cornelia said, "you can't just stretch a story", since the author (and maybe readers, too) would be awfully bored by just adding things. Can we also apply  this principle to a blog? If we just keep updating without taking notices of the contents and your audience's interest, will you and your readers become awfully bored too?

Forgive me of not sticking to the topic. Now lets come back to the dragon. The word 'dragon' comes from the Greek word, drakon, meaning 'enormous serpent'.  In Western cultures, dragons are nearly always seen as bad, they are incarnations of evil, but in Asian cultures, dragons are forces of anture and most of them are symbols of good luck and loved by all.

There are many dragon stories around the world. In England, the most famous story is about St George battled with a dragon to rescue a young lady - and in doing so he became the patron saint of England, even though he was originally a Roman soldier.
the-map-in-dragon-rider

www.CorneliaFunkeFans.com
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nightsoil men

In Victorian time, building were often put up before water and sewage pipes were laid down so a single tap or pump might have to serve hundreds of people. Toilet waste was carried away by 'nightsoil men'.  Some seeped into the water supply and rivers became polluted by factory and human waste. In 1858, the Thames in London became so smelly that the year was known as 'the year of the Great Stink'!
Post a Comment
Read more

Panic or panick

There is only one spelling for panic ; the verb is inflected 'panic, panics, panicked, and panicking’. The form panick is used for progressive tense, past tense and past participle. We don't write panick today, though English speakers from a few hundred years ago might have (in the same way they might have written musick). When the alternate spelling “panick” is used for the past participle: "I panicked last night at the disco." When it’s use for progressive tense: “Invariably, when markets are panicking, they sell the stocks quickly.” It's the rule for root words ending in "c" is that you have to add “k”, so the spelling is related with the pronunciation. If we don't add the <k>, it looks as if the <c> has to be pronounced /s/. If the "k" was not there, “panicing” would look like the word which is supposed to be pronounced as if it is ended in "sing," while “paniced” would be pronounced like “panised”. The same ...
1 comment
Read more

The Indian Mutiny

British rulers were shaken to the core by the Indian Mutiny of 1857. The spark which lit the fuse of the rebellion was when cartridges were given to Indian troops which were coated in grease, made from cow or pig fat. These cartridges had to be prepared for firing by being bitten at one end. The cow is a sacred animal to the Hindus and the pig is regarded as unclean by Muslims, so no one was happy. Indian troops refused to bite the cartridges. Their British officers hanged a few. The troops rioted. They killed their officers, ransacked Delhi, and massacred British men, women and children. For a long time it looked as if the British might be defeated. The rebellion was about more than just biting cartridges. It was a revolt against taxation and the laws of the East India Company, which ruled India for Britain. After the mutiny, the British were a lot more careful about how they governed India. When the news of the mutiny reached England, crowds bayed for blood and Victoria was hor...
Post a Comment
Read more